Thursday, December 3, 2009
Don't let the sun go down on me
Thursday, September 17, 2009
The Thinker
Thursday, September 3, 2009
Life's soundtrack of silence and sound...
Thursday, August 20, 2009
A balancing act
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Pieces of me
Sunday, June 28, 2009
The Awakening
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Retract the claws...
Sunday, June 14, 2009
LGBT Perceptions: Black & White?
Wednesday, June 10, 2009
LGBT ADHD

Monday, June 1, 2009
I'm proud, I think. How 'bout you?
Monday, May 25, 2009
Finally - the levity I mentioned so long ago...
Hi loyal readers! I know I haven’t updated in a long time. I’m sorry, but…
10 … Since I had the facial reconstruction surgery I can actually get laid.
9… Really, isn’t quality more important then quantity?
8… It turns out my boss actually wants me to do some work in exchange for the money he gives me weekly.
7… I thought I had updated the blog, but it turns out I was high and only THOUGHT I did.
6… I was waiting for the Republicans to regroup.
5… I was having more fun beating my head against a wall covered in nails.
4… I was trying to break the record for longest masturbation session; it’s hard to type and “love yourself” at the same time.
3… I was kidnapped by terrorists while in Afghanistan. Luckily I was able to build an armor out of scraps of metal and old electronic components and used it to escape. Still couldn’t get the damn phone browser to work though.
2… I did update! But some Chinese hackers broke into the site and erased the posts. Then some Filipino hackers broke into my home computer and deleted the drafts I had saved. And then someone's dog ate my printouts.
1 … I forgot the password to the blog.
Sunday, May 24, 2009
Consequences
It seems I’m on a roll with the religious conservatives vs. the rest of us, so why not keep going. I wrote this kind of in conjunction with the previous post, and when I realized they were in the same realm, just made a few changes to help the through line.
So, we want a dose of religious freedom, do we? And we want the government to recognize that freedom, right? Yay…that’s awesome. We should totally do that! (Oh wait, we already do.) And what if there was a religion that defined marriage as a union of love and commitment between any two people, no matter their sex? Would the government then be compelled to allow such marriages to be civilly recognized? The self-proclaimed “righteous” would say no…
Dear, dear NY State Senator Ruben Diaz. Harbinger of all that is right. Moral compass of the people of New York. When your supporters and fellow counter-demonstrators proclaim “Homo is a no no” and “No Gay in the USA,” do you really believe that you’re on the right track? Does that make you feel as if your position is one of strength and good measure because you’re taking such a hard-line, "values-based" approach? Aside from the obvious wrongs of your position and how it is totally antithetical to your belief structure, I do applaud one thing, however, the conviction with which you believe. Unfortunately, those strong, hateful beliefs are so damaging to others, and you make them more so by working to force these beliefs on others. Believe with all your heart, but don’t rip mine out of my chest trying to make me believe the same. It’s time to stop hiding behind religion, Mr. Diaz, and start facing the citizens whose rights you wish kept from them. God did not elect you to the NY State Senate; the people did. Remember that – you are charged to represent ALL of us equally – Christian, Gay, Muslim, Lesbian, Buddhist, Transsexual, Agnostic, Jewish, Atheist…
Many of your colleagues thankfully, it seems, believe in equality. However, they’re terrified of the political ramifications of affirming that equality. How about the ramifications of denying those who support same-sex marriage? How about the ramifications of denying civil and human rights to citizens, not just in your districts, but across the state? I call upon all those with the strength of conviction to confront those Senators, nay – any lawmaker – on the fence and tell them it’s time to “man up.” It’s time to do what’s right rather than what’s politically safe because it won’t be politically safe for long. And if and when you take the path of discrimination and prejudice, you will be held accountable; there will be no back-pedaling, no redemption. You will be reviled for your cowardice, rather than rewarded for the integrity and virtue you could display. Now, look again, and rethink those aforementioned political ramifications.
New Yorkers have been patient, but this is the time. David Patterson may have gotten so many things wrong during his tenure as governor, but right now, he’s so right. “The time for justice, the time for equality, the time for equal rights can never be any more urgent than right now.”
Saturday, May 23, 2009
Oh, the woes...
First of all – I’m a bad blogger. I wrote this post, and the one I will post next on a plane, fully 5 days ago now. Is it really that hard for me to just copy and paste? Oy. Anyway – I submit the following to you, fair reader...
And every day some brand new issue rears its head to piss you off… Well, not so much new issues. It seems we are destined to re-live and re-hash the same worn-out issues day after day, week after week, year after year. The first of these we’ll ‘wade’ into – and the one currently making the media rounds – is abortion. Good ol’ divisive Roe v. Wade. We all know the back-story on the recent surge in the subject’s popularity – but here’s a quick recap. The University of Notre Dame invites President Obama to give the commencement address and receive an honorary law degree. Conservatives rail against the decision. Students and pro-lifers protest, some students even boycott their own graduation. Obama is a baby killer! His agenda is not in line with the university, or its Christian values.
Before continuing on, I feel compelled to remind myself of the quote that first inspired me to blogify on the matter. “Each side will continue to make its case to the public with passion and conviction. But surely we can do so without reducing those with differing views to caricature.” For pro-lifers – the pro-choicers aren’t vicious baby-killers. For pro-choicers – the pro-lifers aren’t all fundamentalist doctor office bombers.
It’s so hard to take that message to heart when conservatives and pro-lifers say that it was “inappropriate” for the president to speak at ND. That is was wrong for him to accept an honorary degree. The vast majority of those in attendance, whether or not they agree with Mr. Obama’s stance on abortion realize that; a) He’s the freaking president (democratically elected by a sizeable margin, including a win of the state of Indiana); 2) He’s an immensely intelligent individual; and D) he, exhaustively it seems, works to bring all parties to the table and recognize every position’s validity and underlying principle. Part D especially seems rather Christian to me. Respect and patience for the other side, no? Love and compassion for all at the table? And to all that, in the case of the Notre Dame controversy, I merely say, take a look at duLac - The Guide to Student Life at the University of Notre Dame. Just a quick bit of web-surfing turned up all the support one needs to drive the point home:
The University of Notre Dame strives for a spirit of inclusion among the members of this community for distinct reasons articulated in our Christian tradition. We prize the uniqueness of all persons as God’s creatures. We welcome all people, regardless of color, gender, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, social or economic class, and nationality, for example, precisely because of Christ’s calling to treat others as we desire to be treated. We value gay and lesbian members of this community as we value all members of this community. We condemn harassment of any kind, and University policies proscribe it. We consciously create an environment of mutual respect, hospitality and warmth in which none are strangers and all may flourish.
Done, right? Not quite. As much as we all want to include - it being the spirit of the democratic process and all - there will always be people that think it’s morally and ideologically prudent to exclude.
This bit of rhetoric brings me to a broader “freedoms” question: So, Christians want their values more entrenched in daily life in America, right? How is such a move any different than the imposition of Sharia, or Islamic law, in majority Islamic nations? The problem with these fundamentalist views is that they exclude and discriminate tremendously against minorities in the population. How is that right, or even anything resembling right? I understand the drive to evangelize. I understand the desire to follow God’s will and do right in the world. But stop for a moment and see what’s really happening. A universal foray into Christian values and principles for those who are not Christian - of which there are millions in this country - is simply dangerous. How can it be righteous to impose upon anyone? While many people in this country are Christian, or support values that Christians embody, we must be sure not to further blur the line between one’s freedom to worship, and another’s civil liberties, even if that other is in a minority position. But people will be who they will be. And they will passionately believe what they believe. Such a deceptively vicious cycle...